The Art Daddy Drama
After publishing an op-ed by the mysterious provocateur, we learned that calling two publications “the last real barometers of independent art journalism” makes a lot of people very upset.
By The Editors
On August 26, Observer published an op-ed by anonymous provocateur The Art Daddy, largely focused on the ways staff cuts and editorial reshuffling at arts publications—or media outlets with once robust arts coverage—and the rise of influencer culture are eroding cultural criticism and why that’s bad for everyone. Reasonably speaking, no one should disagree that this is real and happening and that it’s more than likely going to have a negative impact on culture writ large.
Cultural criticism matters because it does more than tell us what’s “good” or “bad.” It digs into the forces shaping life: art, media, fashion, politics and so much more, which seems like it should go without stating, but what is obvious anymore? Cultural critics expose power structures, assumptions and blind spots. That is important because analyzing how culture reflects and reinforces values reveals who benefits from prevailing norms and who gets left out. Without critics interrogating the hype, culture coverage is flattened into marketing, at which point what sells becomes what matters.